Q Does the writer make a focused analysis of the key moves made in the pop-source? Does he or she go sufficiently in-depth (focusing on 1-3 techniques), providing textual evidence for his or her evaluation at every step? While exploring these rhetorical moves in the pop-source, does the writer go beyond merely identifying the moves to explain how they function within the article? Does the writer sufficiently explore the pop-source’s relationship with the original study, without writing an overly simplistic compare-and-contrast paper?